Clinical Evaluation Tool

Anelto RPM Clinical Tools for Better Patient Outcomes and Quality of Life

Use the Anelto RPM 24/7 clinical call center or your own staff.  Anelto RPM is custom care, your way!

Anelto RPM delivers advanced clinical tools that provide a higher level of care

  • Patient On-Boarding and Set-up
    • Efficient practice and patient onboarding, including program workflows and custom kits.  No logistical burden for the care team or patient. 
  • Clinical Pathways and Health Screenings (graphic of care protocol sample - Sheila) 
    • Customized, provider developed conversational AI assessments that engage the patient and capture real-time data.
    • Clinician access to healthcare screenings that help assess the overall health of the patient, such as, fall risk, medication management, and more. 
  • Unique Calendar & Workflows
    • Provider and patient-specific reminders, patient disease assessments, educational tips, and more. 
    • Easy scheduling as part of a care calendar or included as a part of a specific provider program workflow. 
  • Severity Queuing 
    • Vital sign severity queuing with quick access to physician-driven clinical interventions when indicated.
  • Caregiver SmartPhone App (RemoteCare 247) 
  • Monthly Automated Billing Reports
    • Aligned by patient, the appropriate CPT codes, and the provider to expedite billing.
    • Other reporting is available to monitor alerts and action/outcomes by patient event.

Download Clinical Overview Flyer here

Realtime clinical data and patient feedback

man taking blood pressure

Charleston Area Medical Center RPM Trial

Charleston Area Medical Center (CAMC) enrolled 18 high-risk patients who were going to the hospital frequently for COPD or CHF who lived in rural areas. It was expected that only 20% of selected patients would participate. Surprisingly, 75% of the patients participated.

  • Group 454 (1)
    Based on a scale of 1 to 5, CAMC participants rated the Anelto RPM overall experience highly at 4.75
  • Group 454 (1)
    When asked to rate the likeliness of using the service again if offered, the participants rated as 4.125
  • Group 454 (1)
    The ease-of-use rating by the participants was 4.88